Human Resource Management Group Paper

Question: Discuss about theHuman Resource Managementfor Group Paper. Answer: Summary of Group Paper The group paper comprised of the HR analysis of PepsiCo with a motive to improve the HR strategy, HR outcomes and HR practices of the organization. The paper is combined with relevant theory and a set of recommendation has been made to improve the HR processes. The contribution of the HR strategy towards the success of the business goals is discussed. I have observed that HR strategy helps in the fulfillment of goals such as cost reduction, business expansion and production integration innovation. The way Pepsi responds to the external content in order to achieve the business goals are discussed in a detailed manner. The paper also discussed the effect of the internal context on the HR strategies of the organization. The analysis of the HR process is done with the help of KSP method and leading to different problems in the workplace. The application of KSP method is done by taking into consideration the various problems and deriving suitable solutions for them. The vital factors of the organization are being analyzed such as employees involved, exploring HR practices and assessing the contribution of HR. A HR scorecard has been done which supports the different strategic direction of the organization. It discusses the learning and growth measures such as optimization of the performance management in the organization. The learning as well as growth objective of the Pepsi is to improve the employee capabilities that are required to fulfill the goals. The internal HR processes of Pepsi play major emphasis on the personal development plan of the employees and strive to build their competencies. The c ustomers of Pepsi include the employees, for whom the company strives to make positive work environment and supports employee wellness. A comparison of the six components model has been undertaken that discuses the business goals of the company, reaction of Pepsi towards the external factors and effect of internal context on the HR strategy of the organization. The concluding part of the paper has provided recommendations for the purpose of improving the HR processes in the organization, which has been based on the earlier analysis. Reflection on Theory I pondered upon the theory used in the particular assignment. I found some strong points about the usage of theory in the assignment; however, I have also found some negative attributes regarding the theory used. The HR scorecard theory, KSP method, external environment analysis is done. The theory was well integrated with the practical knowledge concerning the given company. This was evident in the section- reaction of PepsiCo towards the external environment so that the business goal is achieved. The theory of the internal context affecting the HR strategy is analyzed well and integrated well in the paper. The attributes of HR are defined well along with reference to the actual organization- PepsiCo. I have also learnt about the correct way of applying the KSP method and how it is used to measure the HR metrics in any given company. This method is used to explore the problems and derive suitable solutions to them. I have learnt that it is important to define the themes used in HR t hat would help in the business expansion of Pepsi. I have also learnt how to define the employees involved in the process of business expansion. I have also learnt about the different ways that the HR contributes to the operational process including business expansion. I have also learnt a new concept about the HR scorecard that focuses on the workforce, alignment with the business strategy, HR strategy, financials and HR employees of an organization. My concepts were clear since there was use of appropriate diagram in the theoretical process. After I went through the entire paper, I was not satisfied with the amount of concepts used in it. I felt that there was scope of using more theory, which would help in the better understanding of the relevant concepts. There was lack of illustrations provided to support the theoretical aspects except the HR score card. I feel that a lot of diagrams help in better understanding of the concepts. The financial analysis did not contain any tables and chart, which would have supported the concepts more. It would help me to understand the process of enhancement of the different productivity programs. Reflection on Group Process I made the assignment with a group of three members. I learnt the crucial aspect of team work while working on the process. During the initial stage, I was not confident about working with other since I am shy and introvert. In the initial phases, we faced lack of cooperation and everyone was busy doing their individual tasks rather than discussing things within the group. This issue was resolved after a few days of working together. We shared good rapport in the group and the team members helped each other in doing the assignment. We divided the work and hence it became easier to do the job. I was involved in the entire research of the subject matter and writing a small section. One of my colleagues was engaged in forming the structure of the assignment and doing the illustrations. The third colleagues filled in the content part. All three of us gave our recommendations on the subject matter, which was later complied to form the final list of recommendation. The ethical personal ref lection stated the existence of the Ethisphere that puts emphasis on the compliance programs and the leading ethics system in the organization. Pepsi believes in the ethical functioning of its business processes. I have learnt from this group activity that the team work enhances the productivity and also improves the interpersonal skills. I have also learnt to relate content with deep level of understanding. The groups are able to take good decisions as compared to the individuals. I have also learnt how to work in a mutually enriching manner with other members of the team (different members having different perspectives and behavioral attributes). Reflection on Recommendations I have been motivated by the suggestion of improving the recruitment process and I also feel that there is a need for enhancing the hiring policies of the company. I have learnt that the company should use variety of tactics to find most suitable candidates in the organization. The use of assessment tools for analyzing the competence of the employees was also a good idea. I felt that the recommendation section comprised of excessive theoretical content except of practical suggestions. It is true that there were practical suggestions made, however, this should have been more. There should be proper courses of action that should have been done based on the previous analysis. I do not believe in the fact that the Pepsi needs to improve its benefit process. The company already has renowned reward system including health insurance, wellness programs, retirement benefits and proper work life benefits. Hence, this recommendation was not appropriate considering the size and popularity of the company. There could have been suggestions like implementing more number of employee engagement activities by defining the probable activities that can be taken by the company. I learnt that the performance management rating is considered as the most important phase and Pepsi undergoes proper assessment of the employees. I learnt that the company engages in evaluating and reviewing of all the HR strategies within fixed regular intervals. Ethical Personal Reflection It is important to formulate ethical guidelines for the recommendations. I have personally reflected on using the 7 steps model of van Lujik. The recommendation of rewarding the employees well is critically analyzed in terms of ethical parameters. I feel that the core moral issue in this recommendation is fair judgment of the skills as well as knowledge of the employees so that effective compensation package can be formulated. The HR managers and HR department personnel are involved in the formulation of the reward policies. The final decision of the reward policy would be jointly taken over by the HR manager and the senior organizational leaders. I require more information on the different types of parameters used for the purpose of deciding the final structure of the compensation packages. I can say that the compensation structure would be helpful in enhancing the motivation level of the employees. However, if the compensation structure is not done in a justified manner, then there can be rivalry between the employees working together. It is the right of the employees with similar skills to receive similar compensation. The injustice to the reward system may have consequences such as bad interpersonal relationships, which may reduce the productivity of the workplace. The 7 step model of van Lujik comprises of 7 steps such as main moral issues, analyzing the participants, decision making authority, information required, arguments that can be provided, my personal feelings and the conclusion that can be drawn from it. I conclude that the reward system would be done in a more transparent manner so that there is no damage in the interpersonal relationships between the employees who are working in the same organization or the same department. I should pay more attention to the fair judgment while designing the compensation package. I feel that the decision of giving rewards to the employees should be done after proper market research and by gaining feedbacks about the compensation structure offered by the employees. Hence, it is important to implement the recommendation in a fair and proper manner so that there is no conflict in the workplace. Bibliography Beccaria, L., Kek, M., Huijser, H., Rose, J. and Kimmins, L., 2014. The interrelationships between student approaches to learning and group work.Nurse Education Today,34(7), pp.1094-1103. Blackburn, M., Holden, R. and Burrell, C., 2014. Teaching critical reflection in Sub-Saharan Africa: business as usual?.Reflective Practice,15(3), pp.390-403. Clayphan, A., Martinez-Maldonado, R. and Kay, J., 2013, June. Designing OLMs for Reflection about Group Brainstorming at Interactive Tabletops. InAIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings(p. 37). Cohen, E.G. and Lotan, R.A., 2014.Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom Third Edition. Teachers College Press. Fook, J., Collington, V., Ross, F., Ruch, G. and West, L., 2015. A RESEARCH AGENDA FOR CRITICAL REFLECTION IN THE PROFESSIONS.Researching Critical Reflection: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, p.183. Ghaye, T. and Lillyman, S., 2014.Reflection: Principles and practices for healthcare professionals 2nd edition(Vol. 1). Andrews UK Limited. Gregory, R. and Thorley, L. eds., 2013.Using group-based learning in higher education. Routledge. Little, M.O., 2015. The use of critical reflection in clinical practice and health profession education.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association,16(3), pp.177-178. Milton, D.E., 2014. Autistic expertise: a critical reflection on the production of knowledge in autism studies.Autism,18(7), pp.794-802. Monsalve, J.N.M. and Naranjo, J.D.M., 2015. Application Review Authority to the Concept of Formal and Becoming a New Concept of Human Talent Management.Journal of Economic and Social Thought,2(4), p.309. Othlinghaus, J. and Hoppe, H.U., 2017. Supporting Group Reflection in a Virtual Role-Playing Environment. InIntelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment: 8th International Conference, INTETAIN 2016, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 2830, 2016, Revised Selected Papers(pp. 292-298). Springer International Publishing. Pssil, A. and Vince, R., 2015. Critical reflection in management and organization studies.Researching Critical Reflection: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, p.48. Pemberton, J., Chalmers, A., Perry, L. and O'Steen, B., 2016. Finding our Why: Combining Sinek's' Golden Circle'with Service Learning and Critical Reflection.The International Undergraduate Journal For Service-Learning, Leadership, and Social Change,2(3), pp.17-26. Pultorak, E.G., 2014. Stimulating Critical Reflection in Novice Teachers.Reflectivity and Cultivating Student Learning: Critical Elements for Enhancing a Global Community of Learners and Educators, p.163. Sims, S., Hewitt, G. and Harris, R., 2015. Evidence of a shared purpose, critical reflection, innovation and leadership in interprofessional healthcare teams: a realist synthesis.Journal of Interprofessional Care,29(3), pp.209-215. Triste, L., Marchand, F., Debruyne, L., Meul, M. and Lauwers, L., 2014. Reflection on the development process of a sustainability assessment tool: learning from a Flemish case.Ecology and Society,19(3).